RSTLIB less two files -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RSTLIB less two files
From: "Buzz Fenner" <bfenner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 16:01:08 -0600
Importance: Normal
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I need to refresh a test library from a production library.  I want to use
CLRLIB followed with a RSTLIB.  However, there are two database files that I
do not want to restore due to their size.  I've thought of executing the
CLRLIB and then create the objects in question but tweak them with a new
field so that the originals won't restore due to mismatched file ID's.  Does
anyone have a cleaner way of doing this restore?

Buzz Fenner
mailto:bfenner@jonesborocwl.org

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: RSTLIB less two files , Martin Rowe

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.