Re: RE : RE : Savsys in batch

[thomas@xxxxxxxxxxx]

Evan:

(Man, I hesitate to send this... don't really want to start a vacation-reply 
storm...)

On Fri, 08 February 2002, Evan Harris wrote:

> As far as I can tell BRMS runs a screen on the console that waits on a data
> queue. It doesn't run in batch.
>
> It does lock down the screen by requiring a password to be entered so there
> is some security to be had using this method but you could easily add this
> to Thomas' suggestion.

My understanding was that locking down the screen was pretty much to be avoided 
(as questionable as that may be).

> I would use a dataqueue instead of a message queue - it would be cleaner in
> my opinion.

For most circumstance, I'd certainly agree. The particular reason I thought a 
secured message queue with a break-handler would be better is because it would 
allow normal use of the console until the trigger message arrived.

However, it doesn't yet preclude the possibility of someone signing off the 
console. In order to handle that, perhaps it'd be possible to send a Scope 
Message with scope type *EXT. The scope handler program might intercept the 
signoff attempt. This message could be sent by the same program that did the 
CLRMSGQ and CHGMSGQ to establish the break-handler. The scope-handler could 
just pop-up a window saying "Signoff delayed" and then wait.

Tom Liotta

--
Tom Liotta
The PowerTech Group, Inc.
19426 68th Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
Phone  253-872-7788
Fax  253-872-7904
http://www.400Security.com


___________________________________________________
The ALL NEW CS2000 from CompuServe
 Better!  Faster! More Powerful!
 250 FREE hours! Sign-on Now!
 http://www.compuserve.com/trycsrv/cs2000/webmail/