|
Tom, > > 'Useless' in what way? It should still be a 'unique identifier' which is > its fundamental purpose. I guess I could imagine a small troublesome time > window where two systems could be rapidly blasting out uuids concurrently > during the time where adaptor addresses changed in such a way that the > address of one briefly duplicated the address of the other and the two > clocks were far enough out of sync; but a change of adaptor address implies > possibly ending and restarting many services anyway and that can imply > ending and restarting numerous applications. > > If addresses don't overlap and clocks are reasonably maintained, there > shouldn't be any problem. I dont mean that the adaptor addresses are changed on the fly, but that they exist at customer sites and I have no control (or knowledge/interest) in them... ie in all the AS400s in the world, how many have the same address because of the old reverse-addresses? I think whether uuid uses the internal address of the card (which it clearly should) or whether it uses the line description is so fundamental to the point of uuid that the documentation should be clear on the matter. As it is the only definitive answer would require inside knowledge...
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.