|
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] I dont agree that building another LF would solve the problem - unless you need to! It is no good to have one more unnecessary object being maintained on your system. First make sure that you need it! -----Original Message----- From: rob@dekko.com [mailto:rob@dekko.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 8:18 AM To: midrange-l@midrange.com Subject: Re: opnqryf question - opnid, joins, overides, etc. <snip> I haven't been given permission (yet) to build logicals over the files. this WOULD be the best way to solve the problem, but I have yet to convince the powers that be. <endsnip> What are their objections? Performance? I can quote experts that this has not been a concern since V3R1 of the OS. Rob Berendt -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
