>  By casting themselves in the light of "open
> systems" and pointing out that Microsoft is proprietary,

What has my interest in this is the difference between "open systems" and "open 
source". The distinction seems to have blurred significantly recently. I'm not 
clear if any difference remains.

I can't tell if journalists are reporting one phrase in place of another nor if 
speakers are meaning one but saying the other.

For specific example, I've seen 'grid computing' defined in terms of "open 
systems" and "open protocols"; but I've also seen it written about in the same 
sentences as "open source" as if "open source" was a requirement without 
stating what components were required to be "open source".

Tom Liotta

--
Tom Liotta
The PowerTech Group, Inc.
19426 68th Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
Phone  253-872-7788
Fax  253-872-7904
http://www.400Security.com


___________________________________________________
The ALL NEW CS2000 from CompuServe
 Better!  Faster! More Powerful!
 250 FREE hours! Sign-on Now!
 http://www.compuserve.com/trycsrv/cs2000/webmail/






As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.