|
Leif, you are right on target. IBM customers are focused on solving business problems ... which IBM translates into what business solutions do they need. Customers told and tell IBM: "we want integrated solutions .... we want to do business with one company that takes care of us across the company, worldwide!" So.... when you see articles like the one that sparked this latest set of notes and those that don't have iSeries specified it is not because IBM doesn't care about iSeries (that is just not true!), it is because the marketing research from existing customers and those we want to have as customers tell us we absolutely must ensure the world understands IBM is about providing business solutions to the total business. Leif, me too, I'd love to see more specific iSeries advertising ... and we're doing more now than we have. I see the calendar of activities, so I know. Is it all I'd like it to be .... no, but then I'm not an expert in what advertisements catch prospective customer's attention. BTW, I forward your comments to those responsible for marketing and communications of iSeries .... ************ Have a great day! Anne C. Lucas, Project Exec, iSeries Nation and iSeries Marketing - www.ibm.com/eserver/nation1 205/823-4831 T/L 537-9968, eFax: 603-687-8053, 800/223-3907 Pager Admin Assist: Alice Sebastiano Telephone: (914) 642-4109, tie line 224-4109 Fax: (914) 642-6976, tie line 224-6976 *********************************************** Please respond to midrange-l@midrange.com To: midrange-l@midrange.com Subject: Re: Goodbye/400 From: "Leif Svalgaard" <leif@leif.org> > Once we all run linux and no green screens anymore, > there won't be enough difference between the two series > to warrant having two of them. One problem with that analysis is that the iSeries is defined primarily by software, not hardware. That software includes multiple layers, including applications. Besides, when will "technology independence", "single-level store", "object-based design", and "integration" become obsolete. If those design principles become irrelevant at some point, then OS/400 will become irrelevant too. But I don't see that happening. It seems to me that IBM is sending the message that they are in the business of selling INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS AND SERVICES. So rather than emphasize the distinctiveness of iSeries and OS/400, IBM emphasizes middleware that ties all platforms together. Since my product is OS/400 specific, I don't like it. But I haven't reached the conclusion that IBM is against OS/400. I think they recognize a distinctive OS/400 market, but feel compelled to walk the slender fence between all their platforms. Nathan M. Andelin www.relational-data.com _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.