|
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] We don't have any downtime due to backup, most ptf's are now applied to a hot system, we upgrade each time a new release becomes available. We use a high availability product to backup our libraries to our own hot site on the opposite side of town, transaction by transaction. With Save While Active you don't need much downtime for backup anyway, the system doesn't require the system to be in a "restricted state throughout the backup process." There are times for a full save, but generally you just need to backup security and configuration data and your application databases. With 10 casinos and 9 hotels on one 820 4 way we run 24 x 7 x 365.25. We do have application unavailability for upgrades of our applications, but it is planned and of short duration. -----Original Message----- From: James Rich [mailto:james@eaerich.com] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:51 PM To: midrange-l@midrange.com Subject: Re: Mean Time Between Failure for the IBM AS400 On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, John Ross wrote: > We have an IBM AS400 - 730 and 720. Luckily for us, our 2 systems have had > 0 down time in many years. This is probably not true. Do you ever install PTFs or upgrades? How about backing up your system? You do have down time. You may not have any failures per se but you do have down time. It seems to me that compared to other stable systems (i.e. non-Microsoft) OS/400 has more downtime due to backup/IPL. That is probably due to the database backup (which isn't necessary on my other systems since they don't run the DB). But OS/400 requires the system to be in a restricted state throughout the backup process. This can require a lot of downtime every night. Can anyone comment on: 1. How to minimize downtime due to backup. For example, how to get a good "snapshot" of the data while minimizing the time spent in a restricted state. 2. How downtime due to system maintainance (daily backup, PTFs, upgrades, etc.) compares between OS/400 and other stable OSes (like Solaris, OS/390, other unix). Does anyone run DBs on something besides iSeries and can comment on their backup process? Surely someone like the New York Stock Exchange has a lot of data to backup every day and also can't allow their machine to be restricted for very long. How do they do it? James Rich james@eaerich.com _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.