|
From: <jkrueger@andrewscg.com> > What often happens is that the project proceeds on the original > assumptions, and then the users end up in a severe state of disappointment > and disenchantment, because even though you delivered what they > asked for, it isn't what they wanted! ISVs and IBM Business Partners have been under intense market pressure to convert their 5250 screens into something GUI. In my previous employment, our customers (users) were happy with the UI, and the underlying business process. But our marketing department hated to demo 5250. After I left, that company licensed Jacada Innovator and got started with a conversion project. A former associate told me the project was later scrapped. I didn't find out most of the reasons. I think it got down to the cost of supporting a GUI that was essentially identical to underlying 5250 process. You pointed out that when the underlying business process is flawed, the addition of a Web or GUI component won't solve it. On the other hand, it seems that a process that's already sound doesn't benefit much from a 5250 to GUI conversion. It makes me wonder how Jacada earns their millions. Marketing to the intense pressure that ISVs are under to supply a GUI? Or by offering solutions with real value? Nathan M. Andelin www.relational-data.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.