× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. January 2002

Re: Difference in CPU% between WRKACTJOB & WRKSYSACT

Hi, Richard:

These values should be fairly close... unless the time periods in question
are different.  Sounds like maybe your WRKACTJOB time period is much
shorter than WRKSYSACT, maybe.

HTH






Richard Reeve <richreeve@yahoo.com>@midrange.com on 01/04/2002 10:46:49 AM

Please respond to midrange-l@midrange.com

Sent by:  midrange-l-admin@midrange.com


To:   Midrange-l@midrange.com
cc:
Subject:  Difference in CPU% between WRKACTJOB & WRKSYSACT


--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]

All,

       I have a job that when I do a wrkactjob says that it is using 24+%
of the CPU.  When I do a wrksysact it shows only about 2%.  Why the
difference?  Am I trying to compare apples to oranges?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.