Doug,

No, I agree they don't need to...

But ODBC...?  After what has been said on this list?  Who needs a
"saga"...?!?

Whatever happened to the goal of "works first time, every time"...?

ODBC DOES do the job, no doubt...  However, it seems like an extra layer of
complication, another point of failure, and an unnecessary reduction of
stability.  (From what little I read of this thread, anyway...)

jt

| -----Original Message-----
| From: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com
| [mailto:midrange-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Douglas Handy
| Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:08 PM
| To: midrange-l@midrange.com
| Subject: Re: UPS WorldShip via ODBC - why ODBC?
|
|
| JT,
|
| >So why can't they spend the resources to come up with 2 versions
| >of this WorldShip...?
|
| I don't think they need to.  WorldShip is highly configurable.
| After the latest
| reinstall, they are seeing some other things which seem odd to
| them (aside from
| the 400 connectivity).
|
| So they are taking the machine back to their office to re-ghost
| the disk drive
| and then we'll start over again.
|
| The saga continues...
|
| Doug



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.