|
I thought the 170-2289 & 2290 were "throttled back" versions of the 2291. ...Neil "Nathan M. Andelin" <nandelin@relational-data.com> Sent by: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com 2001/12/27 13:00 Please respond to midrange-l To: <midrange-l@midrange.com> cc: Subject: Re: Trivia: Processor MHz From: "Leif Svalgaard" <leif@leif.org> > It may be fun to see the values for several other > boxes. Leif, The test you shared with us seems to calculate a range between 120 Mhz and 140 Mhz on my 170-2290. The published chip speed is 200 Mhz. But this exercise reminded me of a CPU bound benchmark that Joe Pluta and I ran on our respective systems. This CPU bound job took 17 times longer to run on a 170-2290 than the 270-2250. No significant other work was going on at the time. But the calculated Mhz of the 270-2250 is approximately double. What gives? Shouldn't Mhz be a close indicator of the amount of time a job spends in the CPU? Nathan M. Andelin www.relational-data.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.