On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Andy Nolen-Parkhouse wrote:

> * You could take advantage of the integrated backup capability and have
> one less point-of-failure at the remote site.

This is not necessarily a good thing.  Now you have a single point of
failure.  If your tape drive stops working you can't back up either
server.  I believe point of failure means something that kills everything.
Using this definition having two different boxes means you *don't* have a
point of failure.  Instead you could lose w2k or iSeries, but probably not
both.  If a device or service is critical to you, it had better be
redundant and failures in other components should not affect it.

Of course not everyone can afford to work this way.  I know I can't.

James Rich
james@eaerich.com



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.