|
Walden, I think all of your points are pretty valid. Again the criteria I use is AS/400 integration and skill set. None of us have an idea of your environment(s) and skills so our points may not specifically valid for you but they can be very valid for us or someone else. If the server itself is to be integrated with an existing AS/400 environment or application then a lot of points are very valid. If the server is intended to be more standalone they lose strength. Someone's specific environment will dictate whether some of the items are valid. For example, we use Ops Nav extensively so why would I want to use something else? If you are using something else I wouldn't expect you to jump right on to the Ops Nav bandwagon. The point for using Ops Nav isn't wrong it may just not be applicable to someone's environment. That doesn't make it a bad idea. 8) Data exchange doesn't go over the network -- SO? Well, so far as availability and security go my network is the weakest link. Switched networks are making security concerns a lot more moot but it does reduce that risk. Minor most likely but still valid. Regarding reliability and the ability to support the non-use of the network is actually a big plus for us. The speed gain is nice but I suppose that also depends on your environments and needs. True, network problems may make most things unavailable since clients have a problem but for some configurations and networks it is really nice to have data interchange between two critical servers not be affected. Very similar to one of the benefits of LPAR..... 10) 24x7 maintenance -- Again huh? How does running W2K in an iSeries enable that? Again, this may be specific to us. We maintain all servers 24x7 with outside providers. Some could argue that it's more expensive than keeping extra servers around but I can't attest to that. I maintain my AS/400 24x7. If I put that card in it, it is maintained at 24x7 with no additional expense. Which, since the IXS is a simple card it's risk for failure should be less than that of a external server but....you can slice that a few different ways depending on your attitude and environment. My read is that for you there may not be a compelling reason to do this. However, I look at all of the items and would say for us (and then potentially other customers) that most of the things are truly beneficial. A definite 'it depends' kind of solution......... We have about 10 NT/W2K servers in house. Two of them are perfect for integration so therefore they are.....the rest don't seem to fit the mold.....so therefore they aren't. "Walden H. Leverich" To: midrange-l@midrange.com <WaldenL@TechSo cc: ftInc.com> Subject: RE: WHY would I run Windows on my iSeries? 12/19/01 10:51 AM Please respond to midrange-l
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.