Richard, I assumed I was being flamed, so responded. But your points are well-taken. Hope you saw my points, as well. *INLR = *ON RETURN (Speaking for myself, only.) jt | -----Original Message----- | From: firstname.lastname@example.org | [mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf Of Richard Reeve | Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 8:38 AM | To: firstname.lastname@example.org | Subject: RE: Reply quoted | | | -- | [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] | | If useful, meaningful (and helpful) content is the point of this | forum, it would appear that those that choose to banter about | meaningless content and then complain about the same are just as | guilty as those that they are complaining about. I find this | site extremely useful and am more than willing to sift through | the BS from time to time. Arguing about this is only increasing | the number of non-productive posts. | Might we give it a break?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.