--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]

I would start by setting the system value(s) relating to machine pool size, max 
active and a few others.  If you look in the work management manual there used 
to be a section on performance tuning, whereby pool sizes, faulting rates, and 
paging are explained.  You can really speed the system up by properly 
allocating memory in your subsystem descriptions.
Be sure that you understand what you are doing before jumping on this as you 
could end up doing more harm than good.  Just take your time and follow the 
manual.  I found that it worked quite nicely.
  prumschlag@phdinc.com wrote:

I have been asked to come up with a plan so that no user will ever have to wait
more than 30 seconds for an AS/400 interactive response. The request (from the
company president) was based on a completely out-of-context observation of one
user who had to wait 2 minutes for a response to one particular screen on one
occurrence. The president's intent is good, he just does not know what he is
asking for.

Because I don't believe his request can be or should be satisfied as he worded
it, I am planning to reshape it into an initiative to monitor both average and
longest response times, set goals (not guarantees) for both, be able to explain
exceptions, and propose a series of solutions that are most cost effective. I
will report this to him on a monthly basis. Sounds pretty noble, huh?

Just for the record, Ops Navigator shows that throughout the day our average
response time is normally under 2 seconds, and often under 1 second. We are
running JDE World on a 730 dual processor.

I am sure there are hundreds of ways to approach this (bigger processor, more
memory, more disks, better management of file sizes, better scheduling of batch
jobs, LPAR(?), separate test box, programming changes, yada, yada, yada.).

Here is my question (finally). Other than pulling out the Performance Tuning
manuals, is there a quicker/easier/better way to approach this? Remember, my
goal is to develop meaningful performance measures and be able to identify
solutions to performance problems.

Thanks.
Phil


_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.





---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctionsfor all of your holiday gifts!


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.