|
1. I have long suspected that IBM is mature in the utilization of computer resources, such that 94% compression possible on a PC is more an indication that PC objects waste space than a problem with compression algorithms. 2. There is a compression of sorts to send 400 data over a communication line. When we first started with remote sites years ago, I was concerned about modem speeds, line speeds, amount of data to be transmitted. I felt that end result for users would be too slow, but I had not bargained for how efficiently the data was compressed over the communication process. Perhaps that is applicable here? MacWheel99@aol.com (Alister Wm Macintyre) (Al Mac) brad@elstore.com writes: > rob@dekko.com wrote: > > > > Savlib's to save files with DTACPR(*Yes) is significantly smaller than > > without. > > I don't really have a good way to check that, because I don't > have a production AS/400 with a decent sized database. However, > none of the compressions things I have seen do better than about > 50% - and the PC on databases can do up to 94% (so far.) > > But that at least would let us get more than 650 MB of AS/400 > data on a CD, so it is a good suggestion.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.