Dean, At 11/30/01 10:32 PM, you wrote: > > Here's IBM's reply (edited a bit for brevity) to my question asking where > > the V5R1 PTF is, and their reply, and my reply to their reply. > > I dunno - I hope I didn't speak out of line and didn't mean to imply > > everyone (or the majority) on the list feel this way. > > Maybe I'm wrong here ??? I normally don't join in the "me too" msg barrages, but this issue has irked me for a LONG time. The developer made a boneheaded decision and IBM refused to own up to it, by putting it back to the it was. The PTF should have made the "wrong" way available, not vice versa. And before anyone says that it's easy to d/l and apply the PTF, I've been to shops where trying to get a PTF applied is a major hassle, w/ the forms, justifications, ROI, risk analysis, etc., that I just couldn't get it to happen. -mark
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.