Dean,

At 11/30/01 10:32 PM, you wrote:
> > Here's IBM's reply (edited a bit for brevity) to my question asking where
> >  the V5R1 PTF is, and their reply, and my reply to their reply.
> >  I dunno - I hope I didn't speak out of line and didn't mean to imply
> >  everyone (or the majority) on the list feel this way.
> >  Maybe I'm wrong here  ???

  I normally don't join in the "me too" msg barrages, but this issue has
irked me for a LONG time.  The developer made a boneheaded decision and IBM
refused to own up to it, by putting it back to the it was.  The PTF should
have made the "wrong" way available, not vice versa.

  And before anyone says that it's easy to d/l and apply the PTF, I've been
to shops where trying to get a PTF applied is a major hassle, w/ the forms,
justifications, ROI, risk analysis, etc., that I just couldn't get it to
happen.

  -mark



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.