|
We use Kronos Timekeeper/400 as well. We are on an old version though. The only problem I have with them is that they won't let you install a new version in a test environment. This keeps us from upgrading as much as we should. Mark Mark Walter Sr. Programmer/Analyst Hanover Wire Cloth a div of CCX, Inc. mwalter@hanoverwire.com http://www.hanoverwire.com 717.637.3795 Ext.3040 "James W. Kilgore" <eMail@James-W-Kilg To: midrange-l@midrange.com ore.com> cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: Time and Attendance midrange-l-admin@mi drange.com 11/26/01 04:28 PM Please respond to midrange-l I'll throw in my 2 cents for a vote for Kronos also. Have it in place in a processing plant and make to order mfg company. Works well and the support folks are tops. rob@dekko.com wrote: > > We use Kronos also. Very happy with it. Got the impression that Kronos > was quite happy with their 400 version - much more stable. > _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.