RE: Display files not compatible with new RPG syntax

["Reeve Fritchman" <reeve@xxxxxxxxxx>]

The DSPATR P-field (program-to-system function) doesn't support DSPATR(PC),
and I think there's something else with subfiles where indicators are
required.

If IBM would just finish DDS...

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com [mailto:midrange-l-admin@midrange.com]On
Behalf Of thomas@inorbit.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:22 PM
To: midrange-l@midrange.com
Subject: Re: Display files not compatible with new RPG syntax

On Tue, 13 November 2001, "Joe Pluta" wrote:

> So, if display files were to go away, RPG wouldn't need indicators
anymore.

Since dspf keywords and possibly other syntax elements have been reducing
the need for indicators for a number of years, this got me wondering... just
exactly where are indicators still required for dspfs nowadays? A couple
possibilities came to mind, but trivial workarounds also came to mind
seconds later.

Tom Liotta

--
Tom Liotta
The PowerTech Group, Inc.
19426 68th Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
Phone  253-872-7788
Fax  253-872-7904
http://www.400Security.com


___________________________________________________
The ALL NEW CS2000 from CompuServe
 Better!  Faster! More Powerful!
 250 FREE hours! Sign-on Now!
 http://www.compuserve.com/trycsrv/cs2000/webmail/




_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.