RE: IBM's failure to provide AD tools

["jt" <jt@xxxxxx>]

Phil,

ICBW, it's been almost 20 years since I studied it, and a while since I've
seen much.

I thought it was: label, opcode, result field, ((factor 1, factor 2) OR
free-form))

Oooops...!

I guess I was thinking it would make more sense to RPG-coders to have the
result-field moved from far-right to far-left.  Plus, that would also allow
the editor to shift between indenting or not, and still leave the result
field in a constant position on the screen.

jt


> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com
> [mailto:midrange-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Hall, Philip
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 2:12 PM
> To: 'midrange-l@midrange.com'
> Subject: RE: IBM's failure to provide AD tools
>
>
> > Whoa, there...!  I'm not advocated coding in MI, if that's
> > what you mean.
> >
> > ===> I'm talking about the columnar format of MI.  I'm talking about
> > result-field column on the left; opcode column next; followed
> > by either factors 1 and 2 or free-form.
>
> Hmmm... MI where the OP-code is the second entry on the line ?
>
> Are you sure you don't mean OPM RPG, because what you described
> above isn't
> MI...
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L)
> mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>