|
----- Original Message ----- From: "jt" <jt@ee.net> > Steve, > > You wrote "When you add a layer ( in this case many layers ) to any > software, you increase its complexity. That is bad." > > I can't agree more. Adding an extra layer of abstraction, using OO, in > order to achieve maintainable programs, is also "bad". > > Rather than "bad".. I should say there are tradeoffs involved, in any > approach. > James, The objective in the object model is to provide an interface that the pgmr programs to. The complexity below the interface is the concern of the interface provider. In os400, the interface are cl cmds and system api's. To illustrate my point re: the client server model adds complexity to a system, consider how much more complex ( harder ) os400 would be to for the pgmr if all the interfaces were via dtaq instead of pgm calls. The only tradeoff I see that justifies the client/server model is the low horsepower of a CFINT system. Get rid of CFINT, remove the need for client/server, reduce complexity of as400 applications, improve the viability of our system. Steve Richter
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.