× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



From: Joe Pluta <joepluta@PlutaBrothers.com>
> > ===> no argument, really. I was just not convinced by your very
> > strong statement that C/S is 'far MORE' efficient. C/S is a 'far
> > BETTER' approach for many other reasons.
>
> I think I've restated my position adequately... C/S and monolithic
> applications are "roughly equivalent", but servers have opportunities for
> performance enhancements not available to monolithic techniques.

you COULD do similar things (caching of small tables) in a monolithic
program.

> And, as
> you pointed out, there are other benefits, not the least of which is
> prograsmmer productivity.  Remove the word "far" from my original
statement,
> and we can quit quibbling.
>

remove MORE (especially CAPITALIZED) as well and we agree. The benefits are
not efficiency, but a host of other things, and they are real. One of the
most important is
that it makes it a lot easier to get off the platform.  :-)







As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.