RE: Batch-interactive (was Re: Undoing Fast400 (Re: Tiger Tools ) )

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Thanks for this info. A previous question was, does the bit get turned off
a) when the device is released
b) when the display file is closed
c) some other time
d) never
?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leif Svalgaard [mailto:leif@leif.org]
> Sent: Friday, 9 November 2001 11:44
> To: midrange-l@midrange.com
> Subject: Re: Batch-interactive (was Re: Undoing Fast400 (Re:
> Tiger Tools
> ) )
>
>
> From: <rorr@volante.com.au>
> > <Tom wrote:
> > I'm including a trivial example in CL just to demonstrate
> batch/workstation
> > capability. It's a modification of some demo code that I
> created years ago
> > (apparently V2R1) for testing when I put together a
> function for sending
> > messages to workstations that were at the signon panel.>
> >
> > (I know Tom didn't claim this technique bypasses CFINT) . . .
> > But as soon as the "batch" job acquires the workstation
> device it invokes
> > WSDM and IBM sets on the interactive bit (right?). So you
> end up with CFINT
> > anway.
> >
>
> running Tom's program and then looking at the 5250-bit for
> the batch job shows that indeed the bit is turned on even for
> a batch job.
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
> (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>