Re: Encryption on the AS/400

[Don <dr2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

thougth that's what we had Diffy-Helman for...



On 16 Oct 2001 thomas@inorbit.com wrote:

> On Tue, 16 October 2001, "Nathan M. Andelin" wrote:
>
> > No.  My intent was not to develop a message transport mechanism.  In message
> > transport, my understanding is that a public key is used to authenticate the
> > sender and a private key is used to decipher the message.
> >
> > My API was intended to encrypt and decipher data locally.
>
> Seems like a very limited market if transport isn't an issue. Reasonable 
>authority settings should be otherwise effective, unless encryption is 
>intended to block high-authority users. But a high-authority user quite 
>possibly can intercept any key when it's entered... unless you've implemented 
>some means that protects the key as it passes between the user and the 
>algorithm.
>
> Tom Liotta
>
> --
> Tom Liotta
> The PowerTech Group, Inc.
> 19426 68th Avenue South
> Kent, WA 98032
> Phone  253-872-7788
> Fax  253-872-7904
> http://www.400Security.com
>
>
> ___________________________________________________
> The ALL NEW CS2000 from CompuServe
>  Better!  Faster! More Powerful!
>  250 FREE hours! Sign-on Now!
>  http://www.compuserve.com/trycsrv/cs2000/webmail/
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>