RE: CGIDEV2 performance versus Net.Data

[Buck Calabro <Buck.Calabro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>It seems to me that named activation opens the possibility
>of 4,000 instances of CGI programs to be running concurrently
>(100 CGI programs times 40 BCH server Jobs).

In no way am I claiming expertise in how the machine handles CGI requests;
far from it.  I thought that the server fired up different threads rather
than different jobs.  I have a question and a statement.

First the statement: Activation groups work WITHIN jobs, not across them.
If the server really fires up 40 different jobs, the programs in AG(CGI) do
not share storage, etc across those 40 jobs.  The point being that *NEW or
named have no bearing on the machine IF it creates multiple jobs for load
balancing.

The question: Do named AGs share storage across threads?  I'll try to find
the references myself when I get a chance to hit the internet again later
today, but I haven't got the practical experience (only small tests; no
heavy volume.)
  --buck