|
midrange.com
It might happen because of dynamic priority scheduler.
Before going into lengthy explanations of my theory which might be wrong -
could you set system value QDYNPTYSCD to 0 (off) and repeat you run.
If effect you see will disappear, I might be able to explain it.
Alexei Pytel
"Leif Svalgaard"
<leif@leif.org> To: "Midrange List Tech"
Sent by: <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com>
midrange-l-admin@mi cc:
drange.com Subject: Timeslices
08/29/2001 05:28 PM
Please respond to
midrange-l
I have noticed that (interactive) jobs with a small timeslice
are more "reactive" than jobs with a large timeslice.
This seems to indicate that the OS/400 is not "truly"
preemptive. Is this observation correct, or am I missing
something, or should I even know?
_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
