Re: SAVCHGOBJ (was APYJRNCHG)

["R. Bruce Hoffman, Jr." <rbruceh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Damato <jdamato@dollargeneral.com>
To: 'midrange-l@midrange.com' <midrange-l@midrange.com>
Date: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 7:27 PM
Subject: RE: SAVCHGOBJ (was APYJRNCHG)


>The save command saves members as they are created or changed, but it did
>not account for the deletion of members.  When I performed a test restore
of
>a weekend save and incremental restores of daily SAVCHGOBJ changes I found
>that it accumulated all file members created during the week, even though
>many of the members should have been gone.  Within the context of this
>software package the presence of these members would allow data to be
>reposted.


Yes, but that's the application, not the save. Realize that with a full save
you really have the same issues, just a different twist.

If you take fulls every night, then you can recover to a particular night.
But the deleted members from the previous days are still deleted.

With changes, you can still recover to that particular night, you just may
have members from the full save that are not in the changes because they
were deleted on an intervening time period.

Again, this is an application consideration that has implications in the
save/restore process. All of your applications do. That's why when someone
asks, how _should_ I do my backups, the answer is _always_ "it depends".

===========================================================
R. Bruce Hoffman, Jr.
 -- IBM Certified Specialist - AS/400 Administrator
 -- IBM Certified Specialist - RPG IV Developer

"America is the land that fought for freedom and then
  began passing laws to get rid of it."

     - Alfred E. Neuman