|
Clearly you could use them together. Journaling was an availability enhancement that came out in Release 4.1 of CPF. People that were interested in highly available systems went to it immediately. SAVCHGOBJ was introduced in Release 5.0 of CPF, and it was assumed that anybody that would be using it would first be using journaling. (So the default for OBJJRN was set to *NO.) SAVCHGOBJ was always very slow, because every internal object was interrogated at the object detail level to determine if it should be saved, hence you would want to be journaling as the first line of defense. Since then, two things have happened. 1). Tapes have gotten dramatically faster. 2). An internal object changed bit was added in V2R1M0 of OS/400, which made SAVCHGOBJ run much faster. Today, most people only journal because of the following needs: 1). Use of a HA product like MIMIX. 2). The desire for commitment control, which is a good thing, and not enough people program for it. 3). The use of selected rules of referential integrity. If this answers your question that's great, or else give a call. Al Al Barsa, Jr. Barsa Consulting Group, LLC 400>390 914-251-1234 914-251-9406 fax http://www.barsaconsulting.com http://www.taatool.com prumschlag@phdinc.c om To: midrange-l@midrange.com Sent by: cc: midrange-l-admin@mi Subject: Re: APYJRNCHG drange.com 08/22/01 08:30 AM Please respond to midrange-l Al, Would you mind expounding a bit more on your response to this question? Are you saying don't include journal entries as part of the recovery strategy? Is that a blanket rejection of Journaling, or only in conjunction with SAVCHGOBJ. Why not use them together? Phil Message: 1 From: barsa@barsaconsulting.com Subject: Re: APYJRNCHG To: midrange-l@midrange.com Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 22:14:06 -0400 Reply-To: midrange-l@midrange.com Forget using your journal entries as a part of the restore. On SAVCHGOBJ, change the OBJJRN parameter from *NO (the default) to *YES. SAVCHGOBJ was created when journaling was a key part of OS/400's (then CPF's) save restore strategy. Al Al Barsa, Jr. Barsa Consulting Group, LLC 400>390 914-251-1234 914-251-9406 fax http://www.barsaconsulting.com http://www.taatool.com Jim.Nelson@RCIS-NET .COM To: midrange-l@midrange.com Sent by: cc: midrange-l-admin@mi Subject: APYJRNCHG drange.com 08/21/01 05:31 PM Please respond to midrange-l We are looking at shortening our backup downtime by going with SAVCHGOBJ. Only problem is that we journal most of our files, which means we would need to restore from the SAVEALL, then run APYJRNCHG for the daily saves. The documentation says to expect a longer recovery time, but no estimates. During our 'busy time', we create about 300,000 journal entries per day - tables ranging from 150 bytes to over 800. 1. Anybody have estimates (or an algorithm) on what the recovery time would be? Looking more for those occasional 'restore to a temporary library to check data' rather than a complete recovery. If we ever need a reload, a few hours here or there will be the least of my worries! 2. Any 'tricks' or items to watch for using SAVCHGOBJ and APYJRNCHG? Horror stories? Thanks for your help. JN _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.