× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: chgc0100 exit point. was Default for command without default value?
  • From: "John Earl" <johnearl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 09:25:53 -0700
  • Organization: The PowerTech Group

Steve,

> >All of the above are just examples of how a person who has *ALLOBJ
> >authority can compromise your system in an infinite number of ways.
A
> >good approach is to make security work right up to the point that
> >someone acquires *ALLOBJ authority.  At that point, it is
impossible
> >to secure anything from that person, so stop trying. The
restriction
> >on exit program registration is sufficient, more than that and you
> >start to limit function without providing additional security.
>
>
> disagree. the way it is now, if QPGMR owns the exit pgm, anyone in
the Qpgmr
> group can replace an exit pgm that was registered by an *allobj
user. The
> new pgm will be run by many different users on the system, some with
*allobj
> authority. Code in the new pgm could then check that the user is a
known
> *allobj/*secadm aut user and then do whatever it wants on the
system.

I think you are at the core of the issue here, and think I understand
our difference of opinion.  I feel quite strongly that no production
program (exit or other) should be owned by anyone's Group Profile (and
certainly none of _our_ objects should be owned by an IBM profile like
QPGMR).  Ownership of an object confers (among other things) object
deletion rights.  IMHO, the proper way to secure _any_ object against
replacement (and trojan horse introduction) is to have that object
belong to an "Owner" profile.  That "Owner" profile should not be
anyone's user profile, and it should not be anyone's group profile.

Every application should have an "Owner" profile that has no password
and is not a group profile.  The only purpose of an "Owner" profile is
to be the defualt owner of application objects.  Access to the
applicaiton is managed separately from ownership of the applications
objects.

Following this model, concerns about replacement of an exit program
(or any program) disappear.

jte



+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.