|
midrange.com
Don,
I am curious why you feel it necessary to bash all IBM business partners in
this forum all the time. Do you truly feel that most BP's are not
knowledgeable and loyal to their customer base? I am sure there are some
that are not, but the vast majority are and will continue to be committed
to their customers.
Thanks,
Tony Awbrey
Technical Specialist
IBM Certified Specialist --
iSeries Technical Solutions Design V4R5
iSeries Solution Sales V4R5
Domino for AS/400
Ascend Technologies, Inc.
2658 Crosspark Rd. Suite 200
Coralville, IA 52241
Voice: 319.626.5490 ext. 825
Fax: 319.626.5491
Don
<dr2@cssas400.com> To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
Sent by: cc:
owner-midrange-l@mi Subject: Re: IBM getting rid
of RPG
drange.com
07/28/2001 05:03 PM
Please respond to
MIDRANGE-L
Rewrite? NAH, they'd wing some conversion tool at us and give us a few
months to convert before pulling out the rug...:)
And, then, there's ALWAYS those incredibly knowledgeable, loyal to the
user, WELL POLICED BY IBM and impecibley credible "business
partners"........
On Sat, 28 Jul 2001, John Rockwell wrote:
> One of the problems where this penalty comes into play involves a large
number of
> programs built to provide us with an Executive Information System. It
would take
> a significant amount of time to rewrite those programs just to get back
to where
> we were when we started from a presentation point of view, time that
management
> may not feel too pleased about providing us with. This system is written
> entirely in RPG and displays various business trends in offsetting
colored bar
> graphs. Its used to encourage peer-to-peer management (competition)
among
> multiple plants instead of making the plant managers respond to seemingly
> arbitary directives handed down from above (it gets rid of the 'you
don't live
> in the real world' arguments because they're competing against people who
live in
> the same world that they do). There's also a drill-down function built
into the
> bars on all of the graphs so people can see where the numbers came from.
> Re-writing code for file maintenance programs will be considerably
easier.
>
>
> Joe Pluta wrote:
>
> > There are ways around the interactive tax. In fact, I'll be doing a
seminar
> > on exactly that topic at COMMON. The basic idea is to modify your
programs
> > to run in batch and talk to a data queue instead of a display file.
Once
> > you do that, you can pretty quickly attach a user interface, either
thick
> > client or thin. A thick client can be written in VB or Java, or you
can use
> > a servlet engine such as WebSphere or Tomcat to run your applications
via a
> > browser. It's fast, powerful, flexible and relatively painless.
> >
> > This way, your primary business logic is still written in RPG, which I
> > contend is the best language for defining business rules in the
business,
> > primarily because of its tight integration with the database. And,
once
> > you've started separating your business logic from your presentation,
you
> > can start looking at moving towards a true client/server architecture,
which
> > is where I believe the iSeries will truly outpace any other platform.
> >
> > Joe
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com
> > > [mailto:owner-midrange-l@midrange.com]On Behalf Of William A Pack
> > > Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 11:09 AM
> > > To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> > > Subject: IBM getting rid of RPG
> > >
> > >
> > > I liked Mr. Rockwell's comments. IBM is trying everything
> > > to get people to
> > > abandon current applications and migrate to something they want to
sell,
> > > like Java or Domino. They are good alternatives for new apps,
> > > but if I have
> > > a business running for 5-10 years on good software, why should I
> > > change just
> > > because IBM wants me to? IBM is going to piss off quite a few
customers,
> > > who will remember the favor that IBM did them by jacking up the cost
of
> > > interactive workload. If they have to change applications, my
> > > guess is they
> > > will be implemented on a cluster of Wintel boxes, just to return the
favor
> > > to IBM. I really want to now the technical reasons IBM has for
costing on
> > > interactive features. They claim it is harder to do 5250 now that 3
years
> > > ago. Why?
> > > The System 3/x family was sold as a programmerless systems.
> > > The AS/400 was
> > > sold as a system that will maintain investment in applications
> > > and business
> > > practices. Now, the only thing that sets the 400 apart from the sea
of
> > > Intel based clones is the single manufacturer. Looks like the
future
> > > belongs to Wintel and C#.
> >
> > +---
> > | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> > | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> > | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> > | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> > | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
> > +---
>
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
> +---
>
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to
MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
+---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
