× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: AS/400
  • From: "William A Pack" <tonypack@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 23:50:22 -0400
  • Importance: Normal

        The AS/400 will eventually die or be absorbed by some UNIX clone system 
not
yet in place.  Linux is a stop gap for IBM, a chance to get service dollars
from a free UNIX variant.  IBM is really interested in NT, since they make a
killing servicing it.  I wonder why I have spent my time working in the 400
segment when the PC cowboys make a killing just setting up NT and supporting
it, not adding a damn thing to the customer's business.  I guess the whole
idea of custom software is in jeopardy, since we have evolved enough
technology to make off the shelf components within the budgets of even the
smallest companies.  I think that this has been the AS/400's niche, and the
marketplace will no longer bear a single costly system.
        People will buy Wintel and M$ crap in volume before buying a costly
client/server box from IBM.  As for the 400, who cares about it when you can
buy a fleet of Wintel boxes that are "fault tolerant" because there are
multiple nodes so that they can fail with a hot backup.  I still think that
IBM wants customers to buy Intel servers running either Linux or NT until
they cannot physically plug any more in, then migrate to the zSeries.  They
make a killing either way.
        As for "legacy" software, I get infuriated when I hear this term.  Auto
makers do not harp on older cars being "legacy" automobiles.  M$ has no
"legacy" software since the crap they produce has a life cycle of less than
18 months.  What is the problem with businesses running software that works
without change?  If the business grows, let them buy a bigger machine and
run whatever the hell they want to on it.  When there is a business need for
client/server, or whatever the next paradigm will be, let the customer
decide, not IBM.  The interactive governing by IBM on the iSeries is crap,
and I think that businesses will migrate to another platform instead of
upgrading and paying a fortune to IBM for what they already have.  If you
have to re-write your software, it will done on another platform.  I have
always worked for small companies, less than $100M in revenue.  I know
several that are looking to can the 400 if they have to re-write the apps.
They will run them on NT.


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.