× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Well, I would have to see what was in it for Jackson. I mean, if he wanted
to let Microsoft of the hook he could have made different findings of fact.
But his findings of fact are permanent.

Remember that Jackson's problems around the statements he made affect his
career, not just the Microsoft ruling. Plus, the review won't and can't lift
his findings of fact. They can only change the decisions based on those
findings, and the appeal found, based on those findings, the MS is guilty.
The only change is that the remedy must be revisited.

Jackson's findings of fact went right along with his statements. If he
wanted a milder treatment of MS, he could simply have found them less guilty
and recommended less of a remedy. This would have gone along with his
treatment of them years before when he signed the mild consent decree.

Because of Jackson's findings, there will be a remedy and now the door is
opened for affected vendors (those damaged by MS) to file suit for specific
damages in their case.

Personally, I think Jackson was angry and upset by the way MS treated his
courtroom. I think he felt that if MS knew how much they were ticking him
off they'd be more respectful in court. But it never happened.

----- Original Message -----
From: <thomas@inorbit.com>
To: <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 7:55 PM
Subject: RE: no Java in XP Windows


> John:
>
> On Wed, 18 July 2001, "John Taylor" wrote:
>
> > The whole episode with Jackson doesn't quite sit right with me. I mean,
why
> > on earth would a seasoned, intelligent judge, do something so blatantly
> > foolish, when he surely must have known that it would mean the end of
his
> > ruling? I find it very difficult to accept that he's dumb enough to
> > unwittingly put himself in that position.
>
> Yow! ANOTHER interpretation I thought I was nuts over. The Jackson bit has
been so improbable that I've secretly wondered if it wasn't purposeful.
>
> Tom Liotta
>
>
> --
> Tom Liotta
> The PowerTech Group, Inc.
> 19426 68th Avenue South
> Kent, WA 98032
> Phone  253-872-7788
> Fax  253-872-7904
> http://www.400Security.com
>
>
> ___________________________________________________
> The ALL NEW CS2000 from CompuServe
>  Better!  Faster! More Powerful!
>  250 FREE hours! Sign-on Now!
>  http://www.compuserve.com/trycsrv/cs2000/webmail/
>
>
>
>
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
> +---

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.