Re: Subject: cgi on a Bumblebee

["Nathan M. Andelin" <nathanma@xxxxxxxxx>]

Larry may be right.  It seems that when IBM uses the phrase "the system has
been tuned for...", it could be more accurately phrased "some features have
been geared back...", but it seems to me that some simple tests could be
performed to benchmark the machine's capability.  CGI programs are
classified as batch jobs that normally run under the QHTTPSVR subsystem.  I
suppose IBM could have "tuned" that subsystem to restrict the number of
concurrently running jobs.  Who knows?  Maybe someone on the Domino list has
the answer.

Nathan.


> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 20:35:31 -0400
> From: "Jim Franz" <franz400@triad.rr.com>
> Subject: Re: Subject: cgi on a Bumblebee
>
> only a proposal to a "potential" customer. Larry suggested
> it would probably not work. If someone in this group hasn't
> done this successfully, I'd be scared.
> jim


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---