|
Brad, >Semantics. That very much depends on what involvment IBM had, if any. I was under the impression this CD was strictly produced by the BP. If IBM underwrote the production, then it certainly changes the picture. >But you still have to lead them to water before they'll drink. And we >shouldn't be doing the leading. The person with the product should be. With "should" being the operative word. I thought the whole point of this exercise was that IBM *hasn't* been doing this effectively enough for our collective taste. So it comes back to leading them to the proverbial water. But who does the leading and how? It's great to wave your hand and say IBM should do it. Or to say a CD side show isn't necessary -- you can just demo the machine itself. But that presumes you can lead them that far. The CD can be watched by someone who you may not be able to get to a demo -- say while an exec is traveling. >They will make money. It would take lots of CD sales to turn something into a profit center. It is not the cost of copying the CD. It is the cost of producing the material, which can by very expensive. I haven't seen the CD, so can't comment on whether this is a high-quality production or the type of thing you'd expect late at night on TV when peddling some shoe-string budget widget. It is hard to imagine that a few sales from iCitizens will make or break the production costs of a high-quality production. If IBM was underwriting the production costs, that changes the equation too. >And it will also draw money in the form of more business for them, But that is different then saying they will make money from the CD itself. Of course advertising is intended to generate (or keep) business. >It's advertising, and having people >pay for it. It's really brilliant, actually. Reminds me of going to the World of Coke museum in Atlanta, where you get to pay several dollars just to see all their advertising... >> And isn't that exactly what this BP did? > >Oh please.... So what was (is?) IBM's involvement in this CD? Did IBM commission it? Co-opt the production costs? Just like it when the BP was done? Doug +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.