Re: Free OS/400

[Nina Jones <ddi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Sort of like IBM's full page ad which touted OS/2 and called NT 'Nice Try'.
> And then listed why NT was so much weaker than OS/2?

what they should have done was spend the money used on the stupid os/2 warp ads,
on something oriented to business owners.  a little more graphic than the
newspaper ad, like the blue screen with one of those circles with a line drawn
thru it.

or perhaps an office scene with one guy beating the snot out of his p/c and 
owner
asking what's wrong.  worker 1 says his computer locked up 5 times today, and
worker 2 says if he had os/2 he wouldn't have these problems.  something to get
the word out to the general public (and business owners) that p/c crashes were 
due
to microsoft windows and their poor use of memory.

but what was ibm's goal for os/2?  were they trying to get into the business
market, or capture the kid's market?  were they trying to oust microsoft as the
distributed p/c operating system?

there was an article in usa today when bill gates was in hot water a year or so
ago, explaining what the problems were.  it said that microsoft's profit margin
was 40%, twice the industry average.  and the public was being harmed because
windows had such a lock on the industry that microsoft does not have incentive 
to
fix their problems.  so everyone suffers from their sloppiness.

usa today is a widely read newspaper, but i would imagine that most p/c users 
did
not see or read the article, or if they did, did not understand the 
implications.

nj

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---