× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: WRKOBJLCK automated API ?
  • From: "Joe Pluta" <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 15:09:25 -0500
  • Importance: Normal

Mac asked for an approach to fix the problem.  It would require programming
no matter what.  I offered my opinion that record locks were architecturally
unsound.  I don't think there's an argument there.  You can't use corporate
philosophy to measure the strength of a design. Corporate policy does NOT
dictate good architecture - it simply decrees whether or not a good
architecture is economically viable.

As to the realities of whether a given approach is economically feasible or
not, that's an issue to be taken up in each individual instance.  There's
always a way to justify bad programing practices.  I just try to make sure
that people realize that they ARE bad practices, and that there are
alternatives.

When management says, "program it this way," I like to give programmers the
ability to say, "that's bad programming," and be able to back it up.  I
recognize reality hurts sometimes, but it's better to have the facts.

Joe


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com
> [mailto:owner-midrange-l@midrange.com]On Behalf Of D.BALE@handleman.com
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 1:25 PM
> To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject: RE: WRKOBJLCK automated API ?
>
>
> With all due respect, Joe, the *USE* of the methods you describe
> are clearly
> the exception rather than the rule in the real world.  Whereas,
> most of us are
> smart to handle the record locking issues now for any new
> development, what
> *reasonably* can be done for all the legacy code out there that
> was written
> without the benefit of our superior wisdom?
>
> In some cases it may come down to: "You want to spend HOW much
> money to fix
> something that occurs a few times a year/month/week/day?  Just
> tell the users
> to never leave their desk without the menu showing."  Or some such drivel.
>
> Just my .02.
>
> Dan Bale
> IT - AS/400
> Handleman Company
> 248-362-4400  Ext. 4952
> D.Bale@Handleman.com
>   Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
>   (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)
>

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.