× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: NT vs AS/400
  • From: "Nathan M. Andelin" <nathanma@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 21:15:43 -0600

> Nathan, this is something that we're unlikely to agree upon
> because the basis of the AS/400 argument is that it's the only
> stable computing platform to run a business on. And my
> personal experience proves otherwise to me.

I believe your success says more about your technical and management skill
than the merits of Microsoft technologies.

> I do believe that it is the best platform available from a
> technical perspective, and given my druthers, I'd like to
> see it take over the computing world! But, and this is a
> BIG BUT, I'm not willing to pay $4000 for a $300 hard
> drive just because I like the platform.

You've got my vote here.  This is a serious problem, particularly for small
business, and small divisions of otherwise large organizations.  I don't
understand what Rochester is thinking by giving up so much ground to NT and
Linux in these significant markets.

> However, they only cost a fraction of what IBM wants
> for their cash cow, so many companies are saying
> "you know what, they're robust enough".

A person only needs to track reports of Win-Tel, and Linux server sales to
know that is true.  The same reports have been showing declining iSeries
market share.  It makes one wonder what Rochester is thinking.

> That 270 that you're talking about, when configured with
> 32GB of Non-RAID DASD, 1GB of RAM, and a tape drive,
> costs almost $30K. And for that money, I can't run my Win32
> apps on it, or my 5250 (IA feature adds $77K), or virtually
> any other non-AS/400 application out there that uses a database...

True.  But you do get a system that can host a complex database, and provide
high performance for all the TCP/IP and Host servers, and enables you to
develop and/or deploy a complex mix of Web applications, and requires less
systems management.  I'm just saying that it's a step in the right
direction.  The next step is partly up to people like me - to provide
applications to help you manage your business at a price that makes sense.

You've successfully pointed out a few iSeries handicaps, John.  But do you
see any bright spots in iSeries future?  What is iSeries correctly
positioned for in the market?

Thanks,

Nathan.


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.