|
I am of the opinion that Ops Nav is a pig for reasons other than PC CPU. I have run it over a modem. That provides a different perspective because of the byte counts in the DUN status dialog. I have watched it move hundreds of KB in response to right clicking on something, such as a PPP profile. AND, those hundreds of KB move before the little menu even appears. But it is very inconsistent and I can't predict when it will do something like that. I also find a big difference between a fast 170 we have versus a 150. So don't forget, there is apparently significant server workload necessary to feed that GUI client. Even the 170 is surprisingly slow in Ops Nav, even over the LAN. But on the 150 over a modem, I can watch 100 bytes come in, then a few seconds elapse, then 150 bytes, few seconds, etc. So it is not even stressing the bandwidth of a dialup connection. It is simply the server side trying to supply the data. I don't notice much of a difference between a P-pro 200MHz, PIII 500, and PIII 850 that I use. So I guess I am suggesting that it needs a lot of gas, and that it needs it more on the server than the client. -Marty ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 13:07:14 -0700 From: "Westdorp, Tom" <Tom.Westdorp@StationCasinos.com> Subject: RE: How much Gas does PC/400 need? Office = PII, 333mhz, 512mb ram, win2K(SP2), Ethernet over ATM. CAE 4.5 and 5.1 are fine. OpsNav is a complete pig, to the point of being useless. Home = PIII 866mhz, 256mb ram, win98, cable modem, VPN. CAE 4.5 and 5.1 are fine. OpsNav is still a complete pig but is barely useable. - -----Original Message----- From: John Taylor [mailto:john.taylor@telusplanet.net] Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 11:51 AM To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com Subject: Re: How much Gas does PC/400 need? We have V4R5 CA/Express running on machines configured Pentium 166Mhz/32MB Ram. These are emulation users - not OpsNav, and performance is good. OpsNav is a hungry beast. I'm currently the only one that uses it. My machine is a PIII 550Mhz with 256MB Ram, and I find it slow. So far, I only use it for configuration changes and working with the IFS. All of the job related stuff is too slow to be useful. John Taylor Canada +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.