RE: API -> Commands

[Scott Klement <klemscot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Okay, but you could do the same thing with service programs instead of
commands.  That would run faster, and allow you to use some of these
newfangled constructs that RPG has and CL doesn't.

things like loops, arrays, and native file i/o...


On Wed, 30 May 2001, Jim W wrote:

> One reason is to allow the use of commands to construct custom interfaces 
> without having to write entire programs.  We have a software product that 
> has about 150 CL commands that can be used to create custom communication 
> interfaces between the 400 and "some other box" (ASCII).  Our clients can 
> arrange the commands fairly easily in a CL program without having to know 
> anything about the programs that are working behind the scenes.  Some of 
> those programs are RPG, some CLP, ASM and C, but all they see are the 
> commands and CL.  For this type of application you have many different 
> functions and many programs to accomplish them.  You have to have something 
> to control the whole process, and on the 400 that's CL.
> 
> Jim Whalen
> DCS Software and Services
> 

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---