|
Many, many of the API's have been turned into commands in TAA Tools. Al Al Barsa, Jr. Barsa Consulting Group, LLC 400>390 914-251-1234 914-251-9406 fax http://www.barsaconsulting.com http://www.taatool.com "Urbanek, Marty" <Marty_Urbanek@ster To: "'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com'" <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com> comm.com> cc: Sent by: Subject: RE: API -> Commands owner-midrange-l@mi drange.com 05/25/01 04:54 PM Please respond to MIDRANGE-L I think IBM should provide commands for everything. Every command is inherently an API, but an API is not a command. API cannot be called from the command line, and most would be difficult from CL. What IBM has now is a bunch of people in there who don't appreciate the power of being able to do everything from a command line, and thus, automate anything via CL. They believe it is more important expose a function via an API so it will be accessible from a GUI client than it is to expose the function via CL so it is accessible from a command line. I think both have merit, but I prefer command line. Even if it is relatively simple to front end an API with a command (which is only simple to programmers, that not all shops have), if we all write our own commands to call various APIs, there is no standardization. IBM missed the boat on this the last few releases and they seem to be backpedaling. I just read in iSeries magazine that hundreds of commands had been added to V5R1, some in the context of this discussion: "In some areas of the operating system, we had stopped creating new CL commands, figuring that the GUI was all we needed for a UI investment. But we're taking a more measured approach now, even to the extent of having gone back and added some commands where we didn't do them originally. The point of that is to allow folks to do functions using simple CL commands from within their programs. In fact, we are continually enhancing and creating new CL commands. We've added over 200 commands for V5R1 alone." (Quote from Joe DiCecco, Human Factors Engineering, User Interface Design and Testing, IBM, in iSeries Magazine, May 2001) Rather than knocking IBM for screwing up, I applaud them for acknowledging it and taking corrective action. IMHO, -Marty ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 12:33:09 -0700 From: "ron hawkins" <hwarangron@home.com> Subject: RE: API -> Commands <<If there's already an API that does it, how hard would it be to write <<your own command?! <<Doesn't seem like a very tough job. Exactly! Doesn't seem like IBM should be wasting any time writing commands that we can easily write ourselves. A better question might be "What API's should IBM provide that they have not already?" Ron +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +--- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.