Re: QDBJRN increased activity

[fiona.fitzgerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Thanks, Alexei,
          I'm very familar with the journallling process; my concern is
that we haven't had this escalated
creation of journal receivers before for a Qrecovery library. We've
encountered it during Y2K & Euro testing, where vast amounts of (copies of)
production files were being updated at weekends, and the test -journalling
spiralled. I interpreted this having as a known cause & the decision was
made, not to resize the receivers, as it was an atypical growth, but to
suspend journalling on some files & delete receivers as we went along on
most.

     So now I see it happening again, & this time populating a journal in
QRECOVERY. My concerns are;

- What's causing the increase & how can I tell ?
     (What kind of objects are affected - does it warrant a change in
system administration & monitoring)
- If the changes are being stored to facilitate recovery of part of the DB,
should we be throwing receivers away so fast ?     (System-managed, delete
on chgjrnrcv, threshold is currently 5,000, so the receivers are being
zapped faster than they could be backed up)

All suggestions gratefully received,

Thanks, Fiona

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---