|
> I also wanted to point out that we didn't hear enough about the test > conditions on the two machines. Imo, it's perfectly reasonable to try to > compare a CPU-intensive program on a WinNT (or Linux for that matter) PC vs > OS/400, as long as we know all the test conditions. Analyzing the results > (is it CPU vs CPU or OS vs OS that caused the performance difference) is a > guessing game without knowing more. Now that V5R1 introduces Linux in a parition, I would like to see the results of the test run on an OS/400 partition and again on a Linux parition with the same amount of Processor resource and memory allocated. This might give us a clue. Also interesting to me would be an I/O intensive task again run on the same two paritions although now it will also be important to have the same number of disk arms in the partitions. - Larry -- Larry Bolhuis | Cogito ergo mercari iSeries Arbor Solutions, Inc. | (616) 451-2500 | (I think, therefore I buy iSeries.) (616) 451-2571 -fax | lbolhuis@arbsol.com | #3 1951-2001 +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.