|
> From: "Leif Svalgaard" <leif@leif.org> > The loop the program is executing is so short (about 20 instructions) that > it doesn't matter how large the cache is. No if there is no cache at all, > that might be different. Let's consider the difference between the 2 systems: 170-2290: Processor: Northstar 200 Mhz. L2 Cache: N/A RAM: 320 MB 170-2385 Processor: Northstar 252 Mhz L2 Cache: 4MB RAM: 1 GB If not cache, then what would account for a performance improvement of 11 times? Both systems were doing very little other work at the time. The work is entirely CPU bound. Nathan. +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.