I suppose duration is like field positions, end - begin +1 = length
If I made an adjustment for 1 that would bring it to 12-31-1899 as the 0
base date and day 1 would be 01-01-1900, but that seems a little
Neil Palmer wrote:
> So could the 2 day difference in the calculations be because someone isn't
> counting 1900 & 2000 as leap years ?
> "James W. Kilgore" <eMail@James-W-Kilgore.com>
> The following gave me 1899-12-30 as the base date
> DCURRDATE S D DATFMT(*ISO) INZ(D'2001-03-18')
> DBASEDATE S D DATFMT(*ISO) INZ(D'2001-03-18')
> C CURRDATE SUBDUR 36968:*D BASEDATE
> C DSPLY BASEDATE
> C SETON LR
> Chris Beck wrote:
> > Can someone tell the formula to convert 20010318 to 36968.
> > This would be just like the DATEVALUE in Excel.
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: firstname.lastname@example.org