• Subject: Re: Serial Date formula
  • From: Douglas Handy <dhandy1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 11:56:32 -0400


>I remember lots of discussion in the Y2K prep/test days, when it was reported
>the original forumula used by MS Excel on the Mac did in fact not have the
>proper rules for leap years.  

Although this is not how I recall the early Y2K reports of this "feature", here
is the MS spin on why 1900 is considered a leap year:


It claims the fault lies with Lotus 1-2-3, which had this error.  And MS
allegedly matched the error so their spreadsheets would be compatible.

| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2020 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].