× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.





-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Mildenberger [mailto:Smildenber@Washcorp.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 3:44 PM
To: 'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com'
Subject: RE: Code/400


Jeff,

Are you running over TCP/IP?  We are running the V4R5 version and don't need
the STRCODE session most of the time.  I believe the previous version also
supported this.  I think you may only need the STRCODE session when
debugging.  This doesn't answer your question but could solve it anyway.

Scott Mildenberger

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bull, Jeff [mailto:BullJ1@Midas-Kapiti.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 7:46 AM
> To: 'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com'
> Subject: Code/400
> 
> 
> To the Midrange-L University of Life 
> 
> Programmers at my site have recently started using Code/400; 
> the programmer
> opens a CA/400 session on the AS/400 and executes the STRCODE 
> command;  the
> session goes input-inhibited (the 'X - System' status 
> displays) and stays
> that way until l they are ready to sign off.
> 
> To me this seems like a cock-eyed way of doing things, but 
> heck - who am I
> to argue with IBM system designers.
> 
> My problem : performance data with response times in excess 
> of 999 seconds;
> I have to report on these statistics, which make it appear 
> that the system
> performance is shot to blazes; in reality the response times 
> of the 'normal
> busy users' are still very good (.4s), though the average 
> with these long
> responses included has gone as high as 14.9s.
> 
> Any suggestions on how I can (a) exclude these STRCODE jobs 
> or transactions
> from the stats ?
>                                          or (b) use some 
> other methodology
> to connect the STRCODE users with a non-interactive session ?
> 
> I have given a little thought to how I could run these sessions in a
> *SHRPOOLn, i.e. not *INTERACT, though I'm not convinced 
> enough to try it.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Jeff Bull.
> Senior Support Consultant
> Certified IBM AS/400 System Administrator
> Midas Kapiti International Ltd
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
+---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.