× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: What About Price vs. Performance?
  • From: "James W. Kilgore" <eMail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 15:32:54 -0700
  • Organization: Progressive Data Systems, Inc.

Joe Pluta wrote:
> 
<<snip>>
> "A well written web application can serve up a 3KB dynamically generated web
> page in about 100msec [of CPU time], as opposed to a green screen
> application outputting 1920 characters (or less) in about 20msec."
> 
> About a 3-1 KB/sec ratio (or less).

Hmmmm, must be the new math.  100 vs 20 looks like 5:1 ratio to this old
bird. ;-)

All kidding aside, one of the benefits of the 5250 controller (dates
back to the S/38) is that with a text based panel, AFAIK, the controller
only sends the changed characters not the entire screen.

So although you have the capability of having 1920 characters on a
screen, your data stream may be much smaller.  So let's say you put up a
panel with a clear instruction followed by 700 bytes of data and text. 
The user presses ENTER and you want to highlight a field.  It is my
understanding that the twinax controller will only send the necessary
code to cause the highlighting and _not_ resend the entire 700 bytes. 
I'm not sure if the TN5250 emulators receive the same benefit.

So I guess that the requirements for a 3k page to perform as well, one
would need a processor 5 times as fast and 3 times the data transmission
speed.

Now the data transmission speed is no problem.  Even the enhanced 5250
twinax, I think, runs at 2mb, so even a simple 10mb Ethernet can beat
that.  Even with collision recovery.

IBM's strides in processor enhancements take of of the processor
requirements.

The moral of the story is, you get a faster machine, a faster network,
then you change the interactive paradigm to try get the performance you
had to begin with.

Looking good doesn't come cheap or easy!

Ducking and running ;-)
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.