|
midrange.com
That's the first I've heard of it on RISC boxes. We have several and never
get close. In fact the 400 which had to be ipl'ed every 4 weeks as CISC
now only gets ipl'ed every 8 and that is only because of our routine
maintenance. When was the last time you had this happen?
Rob Berendt
==================
Remember the Cole!
MacWheel99@aol.com
Sent by: To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
owner-midrange-l@mi cc:
drange.com Subject: Re: % temp
addresses = 96.800
03/28/01 04:06 PM
Please respond to
MIDRANGE-L
We are on RISC & the problem does not go away with RISC.
It only goes away by paying attention to various warnings on the system,
like
you are doing, and by periodically studying DSPJOBTBL & other clues to see
what is normal for your reality & making performance tuning so you not
using
excess stuff.
For you to get to 96.8 % SURPRISE tells me that either:
no one paying attention while it climbed, or
you are under gassed for what you using your system for, or
you have periods of serious churning of system resources other than time
period involved in your review of WRKSYSSTS which is only good for the time
period YOU personally accessed it then accessed it again, not for the total
overall system.
You might ask whoever signs on first thing in work day to visit this first
thing, then revisit when their day is over ... those statistics would be a
lot more meaningful.
Elapsed time . . . . . . : 00:00:00
means the data you shared is practically worthless for making any
judgements.
> Seeing "Nearly all available machine addresses used." (CPI0997) in
> the QSYSOPR message queue,
> I am currently looking at a WRKSYSSTS screen on our
> 9406-D60 (running V3R2):
>
> The second level text for the message recommends that we "Do an initial
> program load (IPL) to make more addresses available to the system. The
IPL
> will automatically release available addresses to the system."
>
> We rarely IPL this box (or any of our boxes for that matter), only once
in
> the 6 months I've been here.
> So, I guess we'll do an IPL this evening.
> Can anybody tell me what causes the temp addresses to get this high?
> BTW, I understand that this problem goes
> away with RISC, and we are close to upgrading to new boxes.
>
> Dan Bale
MacWheel99@aol.com (Alister Wm Macintyre) (Al Mac)
AS/400 Data Manager & Programmer for BPCS 405 CD Rel-02 mixed mode (twinax
interactive & batch) @ http://www.cen-elec.com Central Industries of
Indiana--->Quality manufacturer of wire harnesses and electrical
sub-assemblies - fax # 812-424-6838
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to
MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
+---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
