×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
WITH V1R2 software is is for sure a CISC
system and a very early model at that.
At 08:52 AM 02/08/2001 -0500, you wrote:
Not sure about the code
you got but I am sure that 1.2 is way out of date! were up to 4.5. The
9404 is a good machine and can do most anything you need it to do (except
for PL/I it seems). I would get IBM to give it a once over though! On the
other hand If you are thinking of dumping it, I might be interested in
taking it off your hands.
Do you know if it is a CISC or has it been upgraded to RISC (Or were all
9404s RISC?)
For what it's worth, unless you are doing a great
deal of bit manipulation, you might just want to convert to COBOL and for
the programs that do have some of the more exotic features of PL/I you
could use 'C' or RPG or even Fortran.
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Sitko
[mailto:solarsystems@email.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001
16:34
To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
Subject: PL/I for AS/400
Hello all,
We're considering converting our Wang VS system to an
IBM AS/400 because
we're concerned about Wang dropping support for the
VS line. So last week
we picked up an obsolete AS400 and thought we might
be able to get some
hands on testing. The system came with two
tapes (version 1.2 of OS/400)
and a PTF tape, and it has what looks like two full
height and one half
height disk drives. It also came with two
operator consoles.
When we power it on, we expected it to IPL, but
instead, a code of 999
appears on the operator console. Should I just
throw this machine out and
get a newer model from IBM, complete with
documentation and up to date
Operating system? Or does this one have any
value (training value, that
is).
But, since all our Wang applications are written in
PL/1, and I just found
out that IBM does not market PL/1 for the AS400 any
more, maybe I should
look into other platforms. And, I'm told, the
PL/1 that used to be
available was really a very limited subset (no
language support for writing
interactive programs, for
example).
I'd appreciate some insight into these
problems:
1. Is the AS400 I just bought useless? I think
it's a model 9404, but I
have no documentation on it
whatsoever.
2. Should I just trash it, if it's no good, or try to
sell it for a few
bucks on ebay or through a used
market?
3. Is PL/1 available for the AS/400; if not from IBM,
then from anyone?
4. Can someone tell me how to IPL this thing?
Just to see if it works?
Thanks,
Bob
Solar Systems
------Original Message------
From: Dimitri Efimov
<defimov@wiese.com.pe>
To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
Sent: February 7, 2001 8:08:56 PM
GMT
Subject: RE: Help using SNDEMAIL
Angie,
Do You mean SNDDST command?
We have a AS/400 connected to Microsoft Exchange and
send e-mail via:
SNDDST TYPE(*LMSG) TOINTNET((&EMAIL))
DSTD(&ASUNTO) MSG(&MENSSAGE1)
LONGMSG(&MENSAGETXT)
Only thhe name of the user who send e-mail has to be
defined in DS.
Here U can find how setup SMTP:
http://www.as400network.com/Resources/ClubTech/TNT400//bo400ng/as400smtpsetu
p.htm
<http://www.as400network.com/Resources/ClubTech/TNT400//bo400ng/as400smtpset
up.htm>
Hope this information can be
usefull
Have a nice day,
Dmitri
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Angela Wawrzaszek
[mailto:wawrzaszeka@AUSTEEL.com]
Enviado el: miércoles, 07 de febrero de 2001
12:15
Para: Midrange Mail List (E-mail)
Asunto: Help using SNDEMAIL
I have been using this command in a few CL programs
however the recipient
has always been "hard coded". I
am now trying to use this from an RPG
program and I cannot send parms. I tried just
calling a CL program that
executes the SNDEMAIL command and pass the email
address. However I get
that the path contains null characters. How can
I pass an email address to
this command or the CL without having to basically
recreate the whole
program again.
I see from the CL that Address is 7847 characters
long to account for
multiple recipients. Do I have to define a DS
and then pass the whole DS in
specifying where each address could appear,
name of recipient and the type
(ie. *PRI...) or can I somehow just pass an
email address and message to
the command and except all other defaults so the DS
will get created when
the CL is called?
Angie Wawrzaszek
M.I.S. Department
-----------------------------------------------
FREE! The World's Best Email Address
@email.com
Reserve your name now at
http://www.email.com
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.