• Subject: RE: Connecting Microsoft Solutions with legacy systems
  • From: "Urbanek, Marty" <Marty_Urbanek@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:18:46 -0500


I think the main advantages to SNA Server was if you had a large number of
PCs connecting to your AS/400, you could offload some of the work and
management of the connections over to the less expensive PC hardware.
Perhaps in the "early days" it was more advatageous because you could set up
one SNA session between SNA Server and OS/400 and then use SNA Server to
support (theoretically) hundreds of TN5250 users on your IP network. Now the
400 supports TCP/IP and TN5250 directly. One other thing for example, SNA
Server provides APPC communications support between NT applications and the
400, which you can't do natively from the Microsoft world. If you've already
got a couple of machines talking directly and doing what you need, I
wouldn't mess with it.

| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.